Showing posts with label SciFi. Show all posts
Showing posts with label SciFi. Show all posts

Blindness

Friday, February 20, 2009

2.5 GOOMBAS

Whenever I play the "would you rather" game, very rarely do I hear someone prefer to go blind when faced with the vision verses hearing question. The fact is, if you lose your sense of sight, it seems harder to function "normally." You can't drive, you can't read, you can't watch TV, (Lord, I couldn't watch movies!) and you'd have a hard time just walking. And so, the movie Blindness takes these real dilemmas to the next level. What if the whole world went blind?

Based on the novel by Jose Saramago, Blindness portrays a world suffering from a blindness epidemic. Though curious about the how the disease came to be, like most adequate science fiction films, the cause isn't the point - it's what ensues. Mark Ruffalo stars as doctor fallen victim to the infection and Julienne Moore is his disease immune wife who follows him to quarantine, AKA internment camp. From there, let your pessimistic imagination run wild.

What I found very fascinating was how intense and realistic some of these scenes were. These internment camps became toxic waste dumps. Unable to see, these people couldn't manage to do what we take for granted - knowing how to find the bathroom, how to bath, how to live. And those uninfected are unwilling to care for them. Though under military governance, inside the ward walls is complete and total anarchy; ::shudders:: horrors I don't even want to think about but was forced to watch.

The lighting, in general, is ethereal, unique, and thoroughly thought out. There were also times of complete darkness; symbolic of their utter desperation and civilization's decent into savagery. Blindness also becomes a commentary on society's failure to see how and who people can become when faced with such hardship.

However, somewhere in the middle of this world Blindness created, there were character developments that didn't quite make sense, and relationship that weren't fully construed. Though the world was mesmerizing, its characters were too flawed for me to find empathy. Plus the hope was lost in the ending, a feeling I'm assuming I was suppose to feel at the end. Maybe I just didn't get it, but I'm fairly certain I'm not blind.

Movie Review by Jenn Bollish at 8:36 PM 2 comments  

Jumper

Thursday, October 16, 2008

1 GOOMBA

. . . and then he could jump through space and time - now we're in London, now we're in France, I can see Rachel Bilson's underpants.

Completely abrupt, haphazard, and crazy, Jumper is a story about David Rice (Hayden Christiansen) and his ability to jump through space - I'm not sure if he can jump through time though. They may not have covered that in the user manual. One day, after being throughly humiliated on the school yard in front of the girl he's crushing on, he falls through a frozen river and is about to drown. Suddenly, he finds himself sopping wet in the middle of the school library. He then realizes that he can go anywhere in the world, which includes a stop over in the middle of a bank vault. As the years pass and he's worked his way up to a luxury apartment, Roland (Samuel L. Jackson), a Jumper Hunter, finds him, and the whirlwind of jumping, running, and electrocuting begins. Somewhere in the mix, David manages to pick up his former childhood sweetheart (Bilson) and meet another Jumper.

Great CG and beautiful destination shots, Jumper is still just a hop, skip, and a jump away from being a zero GOOMBA, a rating I hadn't thought existed before this movie. Poorly acted, cheesy, and continuously dumb, I purposely gave you a thorough synopsis because I know you'll be curious, but don't do it! My synopsis is better! Samuel L. Jackson, a Jumper Hunter - I shouldn't have to say any more.

Aside from plot retardation (like Millie naively following along with no questions asked, or Jackson electrocuting Jumpers just because, or Hayden Christiansen pretending to be a bad ass), the interesting concept for a story was drowned, maimed, and cindered in the span of an agonizing 90 minutes. The movie started out well. I was engaging, and I was curious to see how it would all work out. Then, that great 20 minutes were followed by the introduction of the grown-up David (AKA Christiansen). Throw in the Snakes on a Plane actor, and you've got yourself a flop.

So Jumper is not good. Don't jump!

Movie Review by Jenn Bollish at 9:50 PM 0 comments  

Cloverfield

Monday, January 21, 2008

3.5 GOOMBAS

Were you sitting there, waiting with anticipation for the awesomeness of Transformers? The lights are dimming, the cold theater giving you goosebumps, the previews are starting, you're starting to sit back and relax and then . . . some weird ass movie trailer with no name plays and you see the head of the Statue of Liberty fly into the street. All you get is a date. A freaking date. "What the hell was that?" you ask. Then, you suddenly "Ooooh" with the rest of the audience as you see the name J.J. Abrams appear on the screen.

Brought to you from the obscure mind of TV's Lost producer, Cloverfield is a documentary-style monster movie about a group of young Manhattanites who try and survive the night. It's Rob's going away party, and as the night goes on and the social drama unfolds, an explosion occurs, and the real drama begins. The friends attempt to escape the city, but when the Brooklyn Bridge collapses and Rob decides to find Beth, the girl he loves, the friends find themselves in the middle of the battle between the US army and the thing before they are able to escape.

Let me start out with a disclaimer - I was incredibly nauseous by the end of the movie. I didn’t see anyone throw up, so it couldn’t have been that bad. But whatever you do, don’t sit up in the front!

Shot entirely from the first-person perspective of Hud, Rob’s best friend and the comic relief of the film, with his video camera, Cloverfield has so many great and cutting-edge aspects of a quality film. The main footage has intermittent slices of Beth and Rob’s day at Cooney Island because the movie is actually “taped over” their one perfect and only day together, and that symbolism in itself is already profound. There is no mention of a monster; the characters only react to what’s in front of them with “What the hell is that?!?” No one knows what’s going on, including the audience; the chaos is absolute, and we’re meant to be as completely in the dark as the fated New Yorkers. The suspense is almost unpalatable (almost), and it’s amazing how seamless the story-telling is when it’s a film meant to mimic an unedited home movie. The ending is perfectly poetic; the movie has a subtle way about it and is never quite that over-the-top. I can't help but know that this is how it would all go down if my friends and I were in this same situation.

However, where Cloverfield excels in craft, it lacks in follow through. Toward the end of the film, it starts losing some of its edge. Though not as satisfying, the unknown is always scarier, and revealing certain things wasn't such a good decision. The characters, through pretty well developed, usually don't react like how I think people (some in heels for that matter) in the middle of a devastated, monster infested, war zone would react.

I've always hated home movies. They have a haunting quality that is so personal and impossible to look away from. Cloverfield captures the final moments of some people's lives, and you're there, unable to help. It's aweful and simultaneously brilliant. Even though it doesn't make my "All Time Favorite Movies" list, the pop culture cult qualities and accomplished method of narration make the film worthy of the hype.

Sidenote: Recognize Beth? That's Rosa, the little girl who only spoke Spanish from Kindergarten Cop.

Sidenote: The radio transmission after the credits? Highlight to see "It's still alive . . ."

Movie Review by Jenn Bollish at 10:16 PM 0 comments  

I Am Legend

Sunday, December 16, 2007

3 GOOMBAS

One of the most awful scenarios I could ever picture myself in, other than being trapped in an automobile that is quickly being submerged by water, is being the last person alive in an abandoned, urban ghost town during the day and then at night, having to hide myself from intelligent predators who will surely find me. I would never feel safe.

Will Smith explores one of my greatest fears in his new motion picture blockbuster I Am Legend. Based on the 1954 science fiction novel by Richard Matheson, Robert Neville (Will Smith) is the last man living in New York City. In 2008, the measles was re-engineered into the Krippen Virus to work as a cure for cancer; however, it quickly mutated killing 90% of the people on the planet. 1% of the population was completely immune, but the rest became the Infected, people who exhibit primal, vampire-like qualities (sensitivity to UV light; attraction to blood)and blind rage. It was the Infected who killed the rest of the population, leaving Robert Neville, a military virologist, a lone survivor. Haunted by the memory of his family, Robert Neville obsessively searches for the cure; desperately hoping that his family's death won't be in vain.

This movie had so much potential. It set the perfect back story. It possessed perfect plot inertial. It perfectly developed the characters. It startled you in just the right places, and utilized silence in a strong way. Will Smith's performance was excellent, especially considering his lack of costars. His fondness for his dog is precious and simultaneously heart-breaking, and his comedic talent helps alleviate the stark loneliness and semi-realistic terror. The CG made everything feel real (it must have cost a fortune to edit out all the people in New York City). Everything felt legitimate, and it was kind of disturbing. But when the curtain for the last act went up, the perfectly orchestrated film crumbled.

I can pinpoint it to one moment; the introduction of the Ana and Ethan. They were presented very late into the film, creating no time for the audience to bond with them or trust them, and the whole fate/God bit was really out of place. It was inappropriate for these new characters to play such a large part in the ending, especially without any foreshadowing of their existence. Their role in the anti-climatic climax was weird . . . did Ethan even have a speaking part? I can't remember . . . They had such a huge plot responsibility but they were such flat and unimportant characters. They were unsuitable for the entire film, and I blame the film's downfall on their lack of character.

This movie could have been so good, and although I Am Legend and Will Smith may become box office legends, they unfortunately won't make it to AFI's top 100.

Movie Review by Jenn Bollish at 11:52 PM 1 comments  

Transformers

Thursday, July 05, 2007

4 GOOMBAS

Here, my friends, is the epitome of the Hollywood Blockbuster. Big, flashy, entertaining, and charming, this movie made me remember what it was like to see through the eyes of my 6-year-old self again. How the heck did they make a mere car turn into a friggin' robot right before my eyes?!? Magic of course! And what about the back story behind the Decepticons and Autobots, cheesy? I didn't notice! It was too awesome to notice!!! Nah, I'm not excited about the movie at all . . .


Based on the popular 1980's toy, Transformers, and, I'm sure, on the the comic book and t.v. series that followed, the Autobots and their villainous rivals, the Decepticons, are brought to Earth to seek the Allspark, a cube that creates life from inanimate objects. Transformers introduces Sam Witwicky, a teenager ready for his first car. As it turns out, Sam's great grandfather played a significant role in this race for the Allspark, so it's up to him to become the Transformer's human ally. He just doesn't know it yet.

As every "toy movie" should be, this movie was so great at evoking the innocence and fun that movies of today lack. Shia LaBeouf's comedic timing was terrific, the CG was remarkable (Bumblebee's eyes, Man. Even with the bot mute, I can see his thoughts), and who can't love a movie where the good guy is goodness and decency incarnate (the regal Optimus Prime) and the bad guy is just pure evil. This movie may have some hokey points of plot, but at the same time, its portrayed in a "realistic" way. Of course ginormous robots would be clumsy and unable to keep their enormous feet from squishing through Mrs. Witwicky's garden. Of course it would be a naive, innocent kid who believes that these alien robots are friends. It sure as heck wouldn't be an adult!

What I did have issues with was the military soldiers and the sound wave analysts. I felt like the movie didn't need them. I don't know if this is because I'm a huge Shia Labeouf fan and I'm biased, but I felt like the other plot lines were almost too developed. Rather than using these characters to aid the existing plot, the writers attempted to add completely different story lines that just took away from the already established story.

Other than that, this flick was exhilarating, the tone was light, and did I mention that it was fun? You have to see this movie in the theaters. I won't be the same otherwise! For a bigger than life movie with bigger than life robots, that calls for a really big screen.

Movie Review by Jenn Bollish at 12:28 AM 1 comments  

The Fountain

Monday, June 04, 2007

2.5 GOOMBAS


Interesting and significant is the director's choice to omit the word 'youth' from the title. In the world of myth and lore, if one drinks from the Fountain of Youth, he/she will remain young and live forever. And always in this tale, there is a man and woman who cannot be together, for they do not agree on what it means to live.

The Fountain chronicles a love story across three life spans; Tomas, the Conquistador, and Queen Isabella, in 16th century Spain, Tommy and Izzie in the present, and in the future, Tom and Isabelle personified into a tree. Stated in simple terms, in all three scenarios, Tom desperately tries to keep Isabelle from what he understands is death. All the Toms search for his own version of the fountain, not concerning himself with youth, but with life. "Death is a disease, it's like any other. And there's a cure. A cure - and I will find it."

Written and directed by the same man who produced the films Requiem For a Dream and Pi, Darren Aronofsky, this is a sure tell about how this film is styled. Abstract and artistic, The Fountain strives to obtain a level of profound understanding, but fails to achieve its goal of portraying an unoriginal idea in an original way. What you get is visual ideas all jumbled together.

Death as a catalyst for new life is a great and old idea, but by emphasizing this through such abstruse imagery, the significance of death and sacrifice is almost trivialized. Interweaving story lines and repeating scenes allude to the idea that life is never ending, but I thought this movie was about new life as a result of death, not just about new life. Death is a heavy theme in this film, but I really felt like something was lost in translation. It was like Tom was the only one carrying the burden of death, and everyone else around him had already found their peace.

The Fountain is more of a visual art piece than a movie. By definition, a movie is "a form of entertainment that enacts a story by sound and a sequence of images giving the illusion of continuous movement," but to me, it was like watching performance art. You don't really get what's going on while you're watching it, and if you tried, you'd fail. All you're left with is a general idea of what it was about; death and new life.

Movie Review by Jenn Bollish at 10:31 AM 0 comments  

Deja Vu

Tuesday, May 29, 2007

2.5 GOOMBAS

The time-space paradox is a pretty complicated idea to wrap your head around, and when a movie gets it right, it usually makes it a good movie. But when it gets it wrong, even a decent plot usually can't save it. However, I guess Deja Vu is the exception because it actually got the time paradox right but the writing was way too over the top to grasp.

Deja Vu stars Denzel Washington, a criminal investigator who is recruited by a special unit of the FBI after witnessing Denzel's skills at the crime scene. However, we later find out that his special unit has the ability to watch, in real time, what is going on 4 days into the past. Its kind of a hokey machine/idea to grasp. A time machine would have been more feasible in my opinion, but alas, we continue this adventure with our hero Denzel to save a woman and the passengers of a ferry boat that died in the present but are still alive in the past. Denzel insists that they put him in some sort of chamber (<---I guess we do get our time machine after all) to send him back in time, and so he goes in an attempt to try and save the girl and prevent the crime that he was originally assigned to.

The ending was kind of like "What the heezies?!" But take a lesson from the Doc, and you'll realize that it actually makes sense. It's actually pretty cool when you understand it. I applaud the writers for actually taking the time to think it through . . . And yet there was something about this movie that makes it pretty mediocre. With movies, the viewer is suppose to believe that in that in the film's own world, certain things are possible. In Deja Vu, this voyeuristic means of seeing into the past wasn't believable at all. Come on, using a time warp camera thing? There wasn't even a transition into the SciFi genre, making it even harder to buy the idea.

Deja Vu lacks in quality and certain rudimentary cinema rules (i.e. having a decent story). This movie may not be a complete waste of your time, but there are so many good movies out that I'd recommend skipping this forgettable film.

Movie Review by Jenn Bollish at 4:12 PM 0 comments  

Children of Men

Tuesday, January 30, 2007

4 GOOMBAS

As a twenty-three year old girl, I don't really think much about kids. Sure they're fantastic to play with, they're cute and snugly, and they're fun to observe, but how much do they really affect my life, especially if I don't have one of my own? Not much. . . . or so I thought . . .

Children of Men is a SciFi thriller set in a realistic 2027, a world where there are no children. For eighteen years all women have become infertile, and as a result, civil society is non-existent. The only country with some resemblance of control over their nation is England, and even there, it is ruled under martial law. Refugees are illegal and treated much like I'd imagine Jewish people were treated during the Holocaust; thrown into inhumane refugee camps and killed for no reason. And then there was Kee, a Fiji refugee who has to run for her life, and for humanity, because she is pregnant and everyone wants to use her and her baby.

This film is a huge commentary on the importance of children and future posterity on our society. Without children, there literally is no reason for the quality of life, no reason for art, no reason to go on living for that matter. Children of Men provides a different way of understanding the Apocalypse. There's no need for a better life. You can't have a family. No need to take care of yourself. You'll die anyway. But what's interesting is that we will all die anyway, but this time, with overwhelming loneliness, knowing that their generation will be the last to walk on earth.

*****SPOILER WARNING*****
The director's use of a handheld camera adds to the realistic qualities that this film bears. I felt like I was in the car when they were being attracted by "terrorists." I was following Theo through the battle grounds(<--a superbly choreographed 15 min uncut scene; you might not even notice that there were no cuts. Ridiculously extreme). The tinge of gray that all scenes seemed to have made despair very visual. A glimmering juxtaposition between despair and hope, I think hope wins out as the words "Children of Men" fade out to the laughter of children. Children of Men is an intense film that needs a lot of mental exercises prior to viewing. You may not want to see it today, but Tomorrow is another chance.

Movie Review by Jenn Bollish at 12:00 PM 0 comments  

Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind

Monday, January 01, 2007

4 GOOMBAS

Tabula rasa; according to the American Heritage Dictionary, a need or an opportunity to start from the beginning. I learned it in high school as 'clean slate'. John Locke believed that only babies where born with tabula rasa; their minds not yet altered by experiences and outside influence. But what if you could tabula rasa your way through life? If you could wipe your mind clean of all experiences that haunted your past and afflicted your future, would you do it? Luckily, like most adventures that we would rather not face, we can live them vicarious through film.

An incredibly artsy film, Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind begins at the end during Clem and Joel's second, first meeting. Jim Carey and Kate Winslet star in this wild film as Joel Barish and Clementine Kruczynski. Joel is boring and dull, while Clementine is crazy and spontaneous (which is already made obvious by her ever changing hair color). They dress exactly opposite, the act exactly opposite, and even their names sound completely opposite. Yet somehow they fall in love. After a bad semi-break up, Clementine, being impulsive, decides to erase Joel from her memories through Dr. Mierzwiak, a specialist who can track the places where certain memories are stored and delete them. Joel, hurt and confused when he finds that Clementine has erased him, decides to go through the procedure as well. However, during the procedure, Joel realizes what he's about to lose.

For the majority of the film, Joel desperately tries to retain some memories of Clem by dragging her to different parts of his brain to hide from the Erasers. There is no need for additional flashbacks or additional commentary because what this film does is illustrate their relationship through literal memory sequences. To us, it seems like Joel and Clem are basically trapped in his brain, running from memory to memory. How Joel and Clementine first met (the first time), how they fought, and what their relationship was really like. Joel had forgotten how good it had been.

Symbolism and lighting plays a huge role in this movie. The color of Clem's hair changes with the time line of their relationship. When they first met it was green, a symbol for youth and vigor, qualities that Joel found attractive in her. Then it turned orange, and Joel began calling Clem 'Tangerine;' orange being a symbol for energy and demand for attention (Joel was also first attracted to her orange sweatshirt). Then during the hard part of their relationship her hair was red, representative of strong and powerful feelings. Other subtle things such as music being played backward as Joel re-lives his memories with Clem. As for the lighting, often times there are spotlights used on Joel and Clem, further evoking the feeling that they are being hunted by the Erasers as fugitives are hunted by the police.

When Clem and Joel meet and fall in love for the second time, this meeting becomes a commentary on the power of attraction and love. The mind cannot fool itself into not loving again. This film has so much wrapped in such a small box. Its just a simple love story, but the way it comes together makes it art.

Movie Review by Jenn Bollish at 2:24 AM 0 comments